Musing on Racism at UCI

By   |  September 12, 2008

For a campus embedded in one of the most conservative, wealthy and generally uneventful areas in America (and likely, the world), we have a surprisingly dynamic and volatile history with accusations and rumors of racism. With such ethnic diversity in the student body, this isn’t a shocker, but most of the recent discrimination scandals are centered around two groups who seem to exist in a stalemate of mutual exclusivity, rallying attention in an arms race of media coverage to denounce the other. The groups are named (spoiler warning!) Anteaters for Israel and the Muslim Student Union.

This is something of an oddity coming into a center of advanced research: two groups who’ve ostensibly transported active strife 8000 miles to scream at each other in a location so distant in time and space from the conflict’s origin that it has lost all relevance. Only fraternity to a fellow brother or sister in faith inspires the leadership of these groups to demonstrate against the injustice of the rival group – and typically unashamed blame of the other without reservation for the unjust actions perpetrated by their own.

It’s disturbing that a University of advanced education dedicated to the illumination and personal growth of its students could be host to such an immature series of shit-slinging yelling matches. Really, what other purpose could inviting former terrorists or someone as volatile as David Horowitz have except to piss off the other group? And erecting a model wall representing the wall around the Gaza Strip while glorifying democratically-elected HAMAS? This isn’t terrorism, because that word’s been perverted by Neo-Conservatives to derogatively condemn any Islamic activism or protest. It’s active and deliberate divisiveness. It’s driving a wedge between UC Irvine students for the sake of increasing unity in a smaller, allegedly victimized minority group. It’s denying acceptance and new, progressive experiences to fall back on the safety of old alliances and hatreds.

The worst part of this storm of anger and noise is the negative attention attributed to the majority of the members of MSU and Anteaters for Israel, members who probably don’t agree with the aggressive and intentionally provacative actions taken by the executive board of the respective groups. For new students far from home, these faith-based inclusive groups act as a home away from home, a group of instant family for the alienated new Anteaters. I can only imagine the relief emanating from freshmen and transfers who already feel out of place in Irvine (don’t we all?) only to discover a group of students who will welcome their brother or sister despite social, fiscal and racial barriers. Being outside of any of these groups, I hope- nay, expect that there is much more than the superficial tantrums that the outspoken members throw at the other organization.

I will admit that I am not in favor of faith-or-ethnic-based unity groups; after all, having a club with such permanent prerequisites as beliefs and heritage simply beg the discrimination of those who cannot change the color of their skin. Beliefs are easier to change, but imply a stark disassociation with non-members. And, of course, a white culture club would be hailed as the next Klan. I guess, as a WASP, I feel more alienated at UCI than any minority, simply because I’m expected to fit in everywhere- but with all these religious and ethnic clubs, I feel it defeats the purpose of personal growth in college: its not who, but what you are that lets you in.

Comments? Leave your intelligent feedback down below or consider following CollegeTimes on Facebook or Twitter to stay updated or to get in touch!

Share This Story:

Page ID #64  -  Last updated on

Please scroll down to leave a comment.

5 Comments on “Musing on Racism at UCI”  (RSS)

  1. Tinct says: Before speaking up about an issue, I would hope you’d take the time to gain some understanding of the basics.

    Pot, kettle, black.

  2. BTW, an admin didn’t make that comment. We still need to fix some of the usernames on the old comments!

  3. FYI: Anteaters for Israel is not a “faith-based” club in anyway. We have many atheists, agnostics, Christians, and Jews in our club. Though most Jews are Zionists, not all Zionists are Jews.

    Before speaking up about an issue, I would hope you’d take the time to gain some understanding of the basics.

  4. If a student club on campus began demanding the destruction of your home country and invited speakers to campus that damned you for being who and what you are, you would want to resist, too.

    It’s a matter of being left the hell alone to live our lives in peace, and representative of the Mid-East conflict, one certain group on campus will not leave another certain group alone, let alone make peace with them.

    That’s all I’m going to say on this.

  5. Interesting post, but I’d have to say I disagree with you. I know a lot of student on leaders on campus, and I think just about everyone is fed up with the MSU. They promote hatred against Zionists (I think over 90% of Jews are Zionists, but check on it), and they call for the destruction of the only true democracy in the Middle East.

    Personally, I think it’s more of a matter of values. While some people believe in democracy, progressiveness, and freedom of speech, there’s a large movement in the world that believes in traditionalism and living life by the book (Qaran). Which one is the so-called “right” way to live? That’s for every individual to decide. But I do think members of AFI are not just standing up for Israel because its their home; I think they’re standing up for what they believe in. I remember earlier this year, when certain off campus Jewish organizations were threatening law suits against UCI Administration for allowing MSU to continue their anti-Semitic hate speech, AFI issued a press release commending the Chancellor for his preservation of the 1st Amendment, while acknowledging that hate speech does exist and is hurtful to many Jewish students. AFI gave their “enemy” a voice when they could’ve simply joined in on a lawsuit. I think that really shows they value a democratic society that pushes for an even more equal equality, and I think that’s exactly what they’re fighting for.

    But at the end of the day though, I don’t think it’s a good idea to generalize about members of the MSU. I’m friends with people in both organizations, and some of my friends in MSU have expressed to me they’re staunchly disagree with the political direction that their leadership takes them, but they’re afraid to speak up. I don’t blame them…when you look at countries such as Iran of Syria, you see that people who speak out against their leadership very often get taken to prison or even hung or stoned to death. Obviously UCI MSU isn’t that extreme, but it’s the same concept.

    Sorry, that was an essay. Thanks for your post though; it really got me thinking.

Leave a Reply to Tinct Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


2019 MBA Admissions Consulting

These days, college is expensive and not the best choice for everyone. But do you know which degree is still highly valuable? That's right, an MBA degree. If you study at a high quality MBA program in the United States, you can use that degree to improve your reputation and career ANYWHERE in the world, unlike law or medical degrees (or worthless degrees from diploma mills). Contact our experts to see if you're a good candidate for our top MBA programs... all our programs are accredited by AACSB! Official MBA partner of The Economist.

[contact-form-7 id='66877' title='Aringo Form']